Game-winning run scores after umpires decide the catcher was blocking the plate, a breakdown
What Happened
In a critical late-season matchup, the Chicago White Sox host the New York Yankees in a tightly contested game. In the bottom of the eighth inning, with the score tied 2-2, the White Sox have a runner on second base and two outs. Designated hitter Eloy Jiménez steps up to the plate and rips a single to left field, sending the runner from second sprinting home. New York catcher José Trevino receives the throw and sets up blocking the plate, but the runner, sliding headfirst, appears to reach the plate before Trevino applies the tag. However, the home plate umpire immediately calls the runner out, ruling that Trevino did not violate the "blocking the plate" rule. The White Sox coaching staff immediately challenges the call and after a lengthy video review, the umpires overturn the original call. "After review, the call on the field is overturned," the umpire announces. "The catcher blocked the plate and the runner scores. The go-ahead run is in for the White Sox." White Sox manager Tony La Russa emerges from the dugout, visibly frustrated. "What are you talking about?" La Russa exclaims. "I invented this rule because my catcher got hurt and we didn't like it. This isn't what it was!" La Russa is ejected for arguing the call. In the top of the ninth inning, with the White Sox leading 3-2, Yankees slugger Aaron Hicks steps to the plate representing the tying run. Hicks crushes a two-run homer to give the Yankees a 4-3 lead. As Hicks rounds the bases, he jokingly calls for a replay review, poking fun at the earlier controversial call. The wild back-and-forth sequence encapsulates the ongoing debate around the "blocking the plate" rule and its subjective application by umpires. Both teams are left frustrated, with the White Sox feeling they were unfairly denied a crucial run and the Yankees questioning the consistency of the rule's enforcement. As the game concludes, the umpires and managers are left to sort out the complex nuances of the controversial call, setting the stage for continued discussion and debate around this pivotal moment in the heated AL East rivalry.
Full Transcript
Click timestamps to jump to that momentthis breakdown is brought to you by
DraftKings it's another play at the
plate blocking the plate we're going to
have a lot of these we always have a lot
of these they're never fun because no
one really knows what's going on that
plate wasn't blocked and that is the
tying run
they're excited about it now the
go-ahead run is on second base and all
of Chicago well not Cubs fans but White
Sox fans are clapping with anticipation
strike Sinker two outs in the eighth
inning slider goes the other way puts it
into left field they come up throwing
the play at the plate out was running in
quicksand at the end it looked like
punched out ump loves his call says hey
why don't you go check that no no need
you were dead dude you were out look at
this perfect beautiful flowing throw all
right let's take a look at the rule
because this is where it always gets
confusing it catcher should not be
deemed to have violated the blocking the
plate rule unless he has both blocked
the plate without possession of the ball
or when not in a legitimate attempt to
field the throw so let's take a look at
that first okay without possession of
the ball he's doing great he's set up
off the plate he's giving the runner
that outside Lane now the bat from The
Hitter is in his way he's going to slide
into that and that kind of sucks but
as the ball is coming towards him he
realizes oh I have to move myself to
make a play on this ball so the first
question the umpires have to ask is is
this a legitimate move to catch this
ball he moves to the inside his foot
does land on the plate they could have a
problem with that but their question is
you know did he have to shift to make
the catch here to play that ball I think
the answer that we would all say is yes
now his foot is on the plate is he
supposed to be perfectly off the plate
or just once he's making an attempt to
move towards the ball
he's allowed to block it that's kind of
how I interpret it right or when not in
a legitimate attempt to feel the threat
well he's in a legitimate attempt to
field to throw so that would mean that
he is he can kind of block the plate or
be in the lane so we're good there now
the next interpretation we have to look
at is a catcher shall not be deemed to a
violated rule six if he is hindered or
impeded the progress of the runner
attempting to score a catcher shall not
be deemed to have hindered or impeded
the progress of the runner if in the
Judgment of the Umpire which is always
funny when they say that because all of
their decisions are basically judgment
decisions that's their job the runner
would have been called out
notwithstanding the catcher having
blocked the plate so if he's you know 20
steps away and the runner is going to be
out no matter what then this doesn't
matter but on this play what they're
looking at here is did the runner change
his course of action because the catcher
slid over so was the runner aiming for
that outside lane and then this last
step he had to really move and come
inside and if he didn't have to do that
if he didn't have to change his path at
the very end to dive inside and could
have stayed in his natural Lane would he
have beat the throw I guess that's what
they have to look at I'm not advocating
for this rule I'm just trying my hardest
to understand what they could be looking
at and determining and if they're saying
that as he's running down and right here
when the catcher moves he then has to
slide inside
you see that so when the catcher moves
his feet to the right the batter moves
his feet to the left
right so that could be where they're
saying uh catcher shall not be deemed to
have hindered or impeded the progress of
the runner now when he does this move
and the catcher moves and then he moves
to the left did that impede the progress
of the runner if he did not have to do
that would he have been safe I think
maybe that's what they're looking at
that in their judgment he would have
been safe if he kept that outside Laney
would have beaten the ball and had and
not slowed down his running path I have
no idea I'm trying to get in the brains
of this umpire up in the booth who calls
down and everyone's waiting and
anticipating and he does call down and
they do say after review the call in the
field is overturned the catcher blocked
the plate they score and that's the lead
in the game and Andrews is a hero and
boat she's like what are you talking
about [ __ ] [ __ ] in me
I invented this rule cause my catcher
got hurt and we didn't like it that's
not what it was he walks out Waddles out
what was the call
trying to figure it out now you can't
argue at all so he gets ejected and then
he's gonna have a nice like oh oh I
understand it's not your call I get it
but I'm just saying that's [ __ ] and
who made the call on that play huh I
want to find him I'd like to talk to him
can you tell me who the umpires in the
booth are home plate I'm not even
looking at him the catcher walks up to
the home plate I was like what did I do
wrong you and I will look at it we'll
talk about it tomorrow I don't know
I don't know I thought you had it I I
called him out so I don't know what
they're seeing so he's like all right
you and I we'll talk about it tomorrow
and we'll figure it out and he's like
huh all right I guess so now the next
game I'm guessing maybe they had a chat
maybe they didn't but Heim comes up with
two on two outs two strikes two run lead
takes that inside fastball and says C
you later home run as he rounds first
base says uh we'd like a review we'd
like a review can you review that I
don't know if that actually got out much
to the enjoyment of his pitchers you can
see he says he called for a review and
he says right now he says yeah he just
did it called for a review and they're
like uh that devilish guy our catcher
so that's what happened this one was
brought to you by DraftKings thank you
to DraftKings I appreciate you guys and
appreciate everyone else for watching
and enjoying and yeah that's a it's a
crazy rule I tried my best to get into
the head of the umpires to see what they
could be looking at I disagree with the
call